{"id":2262,"date":"2014-04-10T11:25:35","date_gmt":"2014-04-10T11:25:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrinfo.org?p=2262"},"modified":"2018-04-10T11:26:10","modified_gmt":"2018-04-10T11:26:10","slug":"appealing-against-the-decision-of-the-minister-of-culture-to-ban-halawet-roh-movie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/?p=2262&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Appealing against the decision of the Minister of Culture to ban \u201cHalawet Roh\u201d movie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n<p>Case no.: 56998 judiciary year 68<\/p>\n<p>Date: 2014<\/p>\n<p>Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n<p>Department: First<\/p>\n<p>Decision appealed against: the decision of the Minister of Culture no, 286 year 2014 to withdraw the license no. 53 year 2013 issued to screening the movie \u201cHalawet Roh\u201d and suspend screening it from all cinemas<\/p>\n<p>First verdict date: 25-11-2014<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mohamed Hanafi Metwalli al Sobki<\/p>\n<p>The Appealed against:\u00a0 Prime Minister \u2013 Minister of Investment \u2013 Minister of Information \u2013 Minister of Culture \u2013 Head of the central administration of censorship on artistic works \u2013 Head of the Supreme Council of Culture each in his capacity<\/p>\n<p>Judges: President \u2013 Yahya Ahmed Ragheb Dakrouri<\/p>\n<p>Members: Ahmed Hassan Al Moqanan \u2013 Sami Ramadan Darwish<\/p>\n<p>Verdict text: The court ruled of<\/p>\n<p>First: the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision appealed against with all results emerge from this decision and obliged the administrative body to pay expenses this request<\/p>\n<p>Second: Before judging the subject, to suspend and refer the papers of the suit to the constitutional supreme court to judge about the constitutionality of the article 9 of law no. 430 year 1955 to organize the censorship on the cinema tapes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 56998 judiciary year 68 Date: 2014 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: the decision of the Minister of Culture no, 286 year 2014 to &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[25],"class_list":["post-2262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2014-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2262"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2263,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262\/revisions\/2263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2262"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=2262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}