{"id":2233,"date":"2012-04-08T10:06:22","date_gmt":"2012-04-08T10:06:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrinfo.org?p=2233"},"modified":"2018-04-08T10:06:47","modified_gmt":"2018-04-08T10:06:47","slug":"appealing-against-the-negative-decision-of-the-minister-of-justice-of-abstention-to-issue-a-decision-for-the-referral-of-the-file-of-regaining-the-looted-finances-to-independent-investigation-judges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/?p=2233&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Appealing against the negative decision of the Minister of Justice of abstention to issue a decision for the referral of the file of regaining the looted finances to independent investigation judges"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n<p>Case no.: 16863 judiciary year 66<\/p>\n<p>Date: 2012<\/p>\n<p>Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n<p>Department: First<\/p>\n<p>Decision appealed against: the negative decision of the Minister of Justice of abstention to issue a decision for the referral of the file of regaining the looted finances to independent investigation judges<\/p>\n<p>First verdict date: 26-3-2013<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Shehata Mohamed Shehata the lawyer in his personal capacity and as a manager of the Arab center for Integrity and Trasparency<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Appealed against: Minister of Justice \u2013 Public Prosecutor \u2013 Head of the Graft Apparatus\u00a0 each in his capacity<\/p>\n<p>Judges: President \u2013 Farid Nazih Hakim Tango<\/p>\n<p>Members: Abdul Maguid Ahmed Hassan Al Moqanan\u00a0 &#8211; Sami Ramdan Darwish<\/p>\n<p>Verdict text: The court ruled of the rejection of the suit for the negation of the administrative decision and obliged the prosecutor to pay expenses<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 16863 judiciary year 66 Date: 2012 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: the negative decision of the Minister of Justice of abstention to issue &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[28],"class_list":["post-2233","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2012-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2233"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2233\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2234,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2233\/revisions\/2234"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2233"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=2233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}