{"id":2206,"date":"2014-04-04T13:17:34","date_gmt":"2014-04-04T13:17:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrinfo.org?p=2206"},"modified":"2018-04-04T13:17:55","modified_gmt":"2018-04-04T13:17:55","slug":"appealing-against-the-decision-of-reservation-of-his-finances-for-accusing-him-of-belonging-to-the-muslim-brotherhood-group-in-case-no-74063-judiciary-year-68","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/?p=2206&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Appealing against the decision of reservation of his finances for accusing him of belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood group in case no. 74063 judiciary year 68"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n<p>Case no.: 74063 judiciary year 68<\/p>\n<p>Date: 2014<\/p>\n<p>Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n<p>Department: First<\/p>\n<p>Decision appealed against: The decision of the committee formed by the decision of the Minister of Justice no. 7995 year 2013 concerning reservation of his finances<\/p>\n<p>First verdict date: 16-12-2014<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Ziad Abdul Gawwad Mostafa al Tabie<\/p>\n<p>The Appealed against:\u00a0 Minister of Justice\u00a0 \u2013 First Assitant of the Minister of Justice and the head of the committee of the inventory of Muslim Brotherhood finances<\/p>\n<p>Judges: President \u2013 Yahya Ahmedd Ragheb Dakrouri<\/p>\n<p>Members: Abdul Maguid Ahmed Hassan Al Moqanan and Mahmoud Abdul Fattah Abbas Mahmoud Al Qorashi<\/p>\n<p>Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision appealed against with what results from this in the way figured in the reasons and obliged the administrative body to pay expenses this request and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 74063 judiciary year 68 Date: 2014 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: The decision of the committee formed by the decision of the Minister &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[25],"class_list":["post-2206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2014-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2206"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2207,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2206\/revisions\/2207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2206"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=2206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}