Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n
Case no.: 9226 judiciary year 70<\/p>\n
Date: 2015<\/p>\n
Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n
Department: First<\/p>\n
Decision appealed against: The decision of banning lawyers from entering the supreme state security headquarter to do their tasks concerning their clients or administrative tasks<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
First verdict date: 21-06-2016<\/p>\n
Appellant: Malek Adly \u2013 Sameh Samir \u2013 Mohamed Eissa \u2013 Aziza al Tawil \u2013 Mohamed Azab \u2013 Anas Hassan \u2013 Mohamed Hanafi<\/p>\n
The Appealed against: The president of the Supreme Council of Judiciary \u2013 Public Prosecutor \u2013 Public Attorney of the Supreme State Security \u2013 Minister of Justice \u2013 Minister of Interior Affairs each in his capacity<\/p>\n
Judges: President \u2013 Yahya al Dakrouri<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision appealed against and obliged the administrative body to pay expenses this request and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.<\/p>\n
Supreme Administrative Court Verdict Date: 9-9-2017<\/p>\n
Appeal no.: 82156 supreme judiciary year 62<\/p>\n
Appellant:\u00a0 The president of the Supreme Council of Judiciary \u2013 Public Prosecutor \u2013 Public Attorney of the Supreme State Security \u2013 Minister of Justice \u2013 Minister of Interior Affairs each in his capacity<\/p>\n
Appealed Against: Malek Adly \u2013 Sameh Samir \u2013 Mohamed Eissa \u2013 Aziza al Tawil \u2013 Mohamed Azab \u2013 Anas Hassan \u2013 Mohamed Hanafi<\/p>\n
Judges: Ahmed al Shazli as\u00a0 a President<\/p>\n
Verdict:<\/p>\n
The court ruled unanimously of rejecting the appeal and obliged the administrative appealing body to pay the expenses<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 9226 judiciary year 70 Date: 2015 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: The decision of banning lawyers from entering the supreme state security headquarter … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[27],"class_list":["post-2187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2015-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2188,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2187\/revisions\/2188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2187"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=2187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}