Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n
Case no.:\u00a0 12089 judiciary year 69<\/p>\n
Date: 23-11-2014<\/p>\n
Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n
Decision appealed against: The cancellation of negative decision of the abstention of the issuance of a decision to withdraw and cancellation of what so called the independent syndicates and unions and the rejection of its foundation<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
First verdict date: 26-6-2016<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Appellant: Guibali Mohamed Guibali Abdul Mogheith as the head of the Public Union of Egyptian Workers Syndicates and a representative of the General Syndicate of Workers in Road Transport<\/p>\n
The Appealed against: 1- President of The Republic 2- Prime Minister 3- Minister of Labor Force and migration each in his capacity<\/p>\n
and 1- Tarek Mostafa Abdul Fattah Head of the head of the General Syndicate of Workers in Property Taxes<\/p>\n
2- Magdi Hassan Ali Ali as a legal representative of the independent syndicate of workers in the road transport<\/p>\n
3- Ragab Mossaad Abdul Azim Known as \u201cRagab al Sawahli\u201d as the head of the General Free Syndicate for Workers in the Road Transport (interfering adverses with the administrative<\/p>\n
body)<\/p>\n
Judges: 1- Ahmed Mohamed Al Shazly (president)<\/p>\n
2- Samir Ahmed Abdul Maqsoud (vice president)<\/p>\n
3-\u00a0 Tamer Youssef Taha (vice president)<\/p>\n
4- Adham Darwish (State deputy)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Verdict text: The court ruled of the suspension of the suit as pending and the referral of the case without fees to the Supreme Constitutional Court to judge the constitutionality of the articles (4-7-13-63) of the Syndicate Law no. 35 year 1976 and its amendments and pending judging of the expenses costs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.:\u00a0 12089 judiciary year 69 Date: 23-11-2014 Court: Administrative judiciary Decision appealed against: The cancellation of negative decision of the abstention of the issuance of a decision … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[25],"class_list":["post-2185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2014-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2185"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2185\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2186,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2185\/revisions\/2186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2185"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=2185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}