{"id":1982,"date":"2011-03-07T11:01:49","date_gmt":"2011-03-07T11:01:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrinfo.org?p=1982"},"modified":"2018-03-07T11:03:13","modified_gmt":"2018-03-07T11:03:13","slug":"hosni-mubarak-and-habib-al-adly-and-his-assistants-in-murdering-demonstrators-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/?p=1982&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Hosni Mubarak and Habib al Adly and his assistants in Murdering demonstrators case"},"content":{"rendered":"

Type: Felony<\/p>\n

Case no.: 3642 and 1227 year 2011 Kasr al Nile Department registered no, 157 and 57 \u00a0year 2011 inclusive central Cairo<\/p>\n

Case Year: 2011<\/p>\n

Adverse: Public Prosecution<\/p>\n

Representation: Accusation authority<\/p>\n

First Verdict<\/p>\n

Date: 2-6-2012<\/p>\n

Judges: President \u2013 Ahmed Refaat<\/p>\n

Members \u2013 Mohamed Assem and Hani Borham<\/p>\n

Court: Cairo Criminal Court<\/p>\n

Department: non accessible<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. of defendants: 11<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Accusations:<\/p>\n

    First defendant: (participating through agreement with other to commit the crime of murdering the demonstrators deliberately joint with other crimes (murder \u2013 attempt to kill) – as the President of the Republic accepted and allowed himself and his sons to use the authority of his job \u2013 participated through agreement and assistant with a public employee to acquire for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of\u00a0 his job \u2013 participated through agreement and assistant with a public employee to cause a damage to the finances of the body he works for)<\/p>\n

    Second defendant; (providing a grant to a public employee to use authority to acquire for him from a public authority some decisions)<\/p>\n

    Third and Fourth defendant: Accepted and took a grant to use the real authority of a public employee to acquire decisions from his job for its reasosns)<\/p>\n

    From the fifth to the eighth defendants: participating through inciting and assistant with public employees to commit the crime of murder joint with other crimes (murder \u2013 attempt of murder)<\/p>\n

    Ninth defendant: participating through inciting and assistant with public employees to commit the crime of murder joint with other crimes (murder and attempt to kill)<\/p>\n

    fifth and from the seventh to the last: causing a great damage through a mistake<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    S<\/td>\nNames<\/td>\nVerdict<\/td>\nAttending \u2013 in absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1.<\/td>\nMohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nLife sentence in the first accusation – Termination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case in the second accusation\u00a0 \u2013 acquittal from the third and fourth accusations<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2.<\/td>\nHussein Kamal Al Din Ibrahim Salem<\/td>\nTermination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case<\/td>\nIn absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.<\/td>\nAlaa Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nTermination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4.<\/td>\nGamal Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nTermination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5.<\/td>\nHabib Ibrahim Habib al Adly<\/td>\nLife sentence<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6.<\/td>\nAhmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7.<\/td>\nAdly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 8.<\/td>\nHassan Mohamed Abdul Rahman Youssef<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9.<\/td>\nIsmail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad Al Shaeir<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 10.<\/td>\nOssama Youssef Ismail Al Marassi<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11.<\/td>\nOmar Abdul Aziz Faramawi Afifi<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    Verdict Text:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The court ruled in attendance of all defendants except the\u00a0 second:<\/p>\n

    First: To punish Mohamed Hosni Al Sayed Mubarak with life sentence for the first accusation of participating in murder crimes joint with other crimes murder and killing attempt<\/p>\n

    Second: To punish Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly with life sentence for the first accusation of participating in murder crimes joint with other crimes murder and killing attempt<\/p>\n

    Third: To oblige the defendant Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubara and the defendant Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly to pay the criminal expenses<\/p>\n

    Fourth: to confiscate the submitted seizures subject of the trial<\/p>\n

    Fifth: the acquittal of each of the following defendants: Ahmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid \u2013 Adly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed \u2013 Hassan Mohaed Abdul Rahman Youssef \u2013 Ismail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad al Shaeir \u2013 Ossama Youssef Ismail al Marassi \u2013 Omar Abdel Aziz Faramawi Afifi from all accusations<\/p>\n

    Sixth: the termination of the lawsuit submitted against each of the following defendants: Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak \u2013 Hussein Kamal al Din Ibrahim Salem \u2013 Alaa Mohamed Hosni al Sayed\u00a0 Mubarak \u2013 Gamal Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak concerning the usage of authority and granting and the misdemeanor of accepting it for the case is expired<\/p>\n

    Seventh: The acquittal of Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak from the accusation of participating with a public employee to acquire for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job and the crime of participating with a public employee to cause a damage in the interests and finances of the body he works for<\/p>\n

    Eighth: the referral of the civil suit to the competent civil court without expenses<\/p>\n

    ==================<\/p>\n

    First Cassation Verdict<\/p>\n

    Date: 13-1-2013<\/p>\n

    Judges: President \u2013 Ahmed Ali Abdul Rahman<\/p>\n

    Members \u2013 Al Said Barghouth \u2013 Mohamed Abdul Aal \u2013 Tawfiq Selim \u2013 Ashraf Mohamed Mossad<\/p>\n

    Court: Cassation<\/p>\n

    Department: criminal<\/p>\n

    No. of defendants: 11<\/p>\n

    Notes: two appeals were submitted from Hosni Mubarak and Habib al Adly and an appeal submitted by the public prosecution against the\u00a0 verdict of the termination of the criminal suit and the acquittal of all defendants<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    S<\/td>\nNames<\/td>\nVerdict<\/td>\nAttending \u2013 in absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    1<\/td>\nMohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2<\/td>\nHussein Kamal Al Din Ibrahim Salem<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nIn absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    3<\/td>\nAlaa Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    4<\/td>\nGamal Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    5<\/td>\nHabib Ibrahim Habib al Adly<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    6<\/td>\nAhmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    7<\/td>\nAdly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    8<\/td>\nHassan Mohamed Abdul Rahman Youssef<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    9<\/td>\nIsmail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad Al Shaeir<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    10<\/td>\nOssama Youssef Ismail Al Marassi<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    11<\/td>\nOmar Abdul Aziz Faramawi Afifi<\/td>\nAcceptance and retrial<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    Verdict Text:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The court ruled<\/p>\n

    First: to accept the appeal submitted by the public prosecution against the appealed against in form and in subject the suspension of the appealed verdict and the repeat of the trial after referral to the Cairo criminal court in a different department<\/p>\n

    Second: to accept the appeal submitted by the appellants in form and in subject to the suspension of the verdict appealed against and the referral of the case to the Cairo criminal court for retrial in a different department<\/p>\n

    ==================<\/p>\n

    Retrial Verdict:<\/p>\n

    Date: 29-11-2014<\/p>\n

    Judges: President \u2013 Mahmoud Kamel Al Rashidi<\/p>\n

    Members \u2013 Ismail Awad Ismail \u2013 Wagdi Mohamed Abdul Monem<\/p>\n

    Court: Cairo Criminal Court<\/p>\n

    Department: Second<\/p>\n

    No. of defendants; 11<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    S<\/td>\nNames<\/td>\nVerdict<\/td>\nAttending \u2013 in absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    1<\/td>\nMohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nThe non possibility to consider the suit<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2<\/td>\nHussein Kamal Al Din Ibrahim Salem<\/td>\nTermination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case<\/td>\nIn absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    3<\/td>\nAlaa Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nTermination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    4<\/td>\nGamal Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nTermination of the lawsuit for the expiry date of the case<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    5<\/td>\nHabib Ibrahim Habib al Adly<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    6<\/td>\nAhmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    7<\/td>\nAdly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    8<\/td>\nHassan Mohamed Abdul Rahman Youssef<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    9<\/td>\nIsmail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad Al Shaeir<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    10<\/td>\nOssama Youssef Ismail Al Marassi<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    11<\/td>\nOmar Abdul Aziz Faramawi Afifi<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Verdict Text:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The court ruled in the attendance of all defendants except the second<\/p>\n

    First: a- the acquittal of Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly \u2013 Ahmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid \u2013 Adly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed \u2013 Hassan Mohamed Abdul Rahman Youssef \u2013 Ismail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad al Shaeir from the accusation of participating in murder joint with deliberate murder and killing attempt<\/p>\n

    b- the acquittal of Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly \u2013 Ahmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid \u2013 Adly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed \u2013 Hassan Mohamed Abdul Rahman Youssef \u2013 Ismail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad al Shaeir from the accusation of causing a big damage in the finances and interests of the body they work for through mistake and neglect<\/p>\n

    Second: a- the non possibility to consider the criminal suit submitted against Mohamed Hosni Mubara concerning the participation of murder joint with deliberate murder and killing attempts for the issuance of an included order that there is no side of submitting criminal suit against him by the public prosecution<\/p>\n

    b- the termination of the criminal suit for the expiry of the criminal period submitted against Mohamed Hosni Mubara, Mohamed Hussein Salem, Alaa Mubara and Gamal Mubarak concerning the second defendant granting 5 villas to the first and his sons and their acceptance with the knowledge of the reason using the first defendant’s authority as a president of the Republic on the governor of South Sinai<\/p>\n

    c- The acquittal of Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak from the accusation of participating with a public employee to acquire for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job and the crime of participating with a public employee to cause a damage in the interests and finances of the body he works for<\/p>\n

    ==================<\/p>\n

    First Cassation Verdict<\/p>\n

    Date: 2-3-2017<\/p>\n

    Judges: President \u2013 Ahmed Abdul Qawi<\/p>\n

    Members \u2013 Mohamed Abdul Latif \u2013 Nafie Farghali \u2013 Nagah Moussa \u2013 Kamal Qorani \u2013 Mohamed Kheir \u2013 Mohamed Taher \u2013 Hani Fahmi \u2013 Ahmed Al Badri \u2013 Ahmed Qazamel<\/p>\n

    Court: Cassation<\/p>\n

    Department: criminal Thursday b<\/p>\n

    No. of defendants: 11<\/p>\n

    Notes: The cassation court ruled in 4-6-2015 to cancel the verdict issued in 29-11-2014 from Cairo Criminal Court of the non possibility to consider the criminal suit against Mohamed Hosni Mubarak concerning accusing him through agreement with other to commit murder joint with deliberate murder and killing attempt and the court decided to consider the subject, the verdict included a support to all verdict issued for the acquittal of all other defendants<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    S<\/td>\nNames<\/td>\nVerdict<\/td>\nAttending \u2013 in absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    1<\/td>\nMohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nAcquittal<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    2<\/td>\nHussein Kamal Al Din Ibrahim Salem<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nIn absentia<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    3<\/td>\nAlaa Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    4<\/td>\nGamal Mohamed Hosni al Sayed Mubarak<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    5<\/td>\nHabib Ibrahim Habib al Adly<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    6<\/td>\nAhmed Mohamed Ramzi Abdul Rashid<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    7<\/td>\nAdly Mostafa Abdul Rahman Fayed<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    8<\/td>\nHassan Mohamed Abdul Rahman Youssef<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    9<\/td>\nIsmail Mohamed Abdul Gawwad Al Shaeir<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    10<\/td>\nOssama Youssef Ismail Al Marassi<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    11<\/td>\nOmar Abdul Aziz Faramawi Afifi<\/td>\nSupporting verdict<\/td>\nAttending<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Verdict Text:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The court ruled of the acquittal of the defendant of Mohamed Hosni Mubarak and the rejection of the civilsuit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Type: Felony Case no.: 3642 and 1227 year 2011 Kasr al Nile Department registered no, 157 and 57 \u00a0year 2011 inclusive central Cairo Case Year: 2011 Adverse: Public Prosecution Representation: Accusation authority First Verdict Date: … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"years":[24],"class_list":["post-1982","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-felony","years-2011-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1982","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1982"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1982\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1983,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1982\/revisions\/1983"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1982"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1982"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=1982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}