Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n
Case no.: 9544 Judiciary Year 66<\/p>\n
Date: 2013<\/p>\n
Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n
Department: First<\/p>\n
Decision appealed against: The decision of the Minister of Interior Affairs no. 156 year 1964 allowing the use of firearms and ammunitions and the negative decision of the appealed against parties of abstention to issue a decision banning the security forces to use water against peaceful demonstrations and strikes, and banning dispersing demonstrations and strikes with fire and rubber bullets, cartridges or teargas or any other arms that would jeopardize Egyptian lives<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
First verdict date: 26-3-2013<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Appellant: Malek Mostafa Abdul Rahim \u2013 Fatma Farouq Mohamed Abed and interfering adverses (Farouq Ibrahim Hussein Ibrahim \u2013 Magdi Hassan Hosni Mohamed \u2013 Ahmed Mohamed Ali Al Ballassi \u2013 Salma Said Abdul Fattah)<\/p>\n
The Appealed against: Head of the Supreme Council of Armed Forces \u2013 Prime Minister \u2013 Minister of Interior Affairs each in<\/p>\n
his capacity<\/p>\n
Judges: President \u2013 Farid Nazih Hakim Tangho<\/p>\n
Members: Abdul Magid Ahmed Hassan Al Moqanan and Sami Ramadan Mohamed Darwish<\/p>\n
Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and before considering the request of the suspension and cancellation the appealed decision to suspend the lawsuit and the referral of the file without fees to the Supreme Constitutional Court to judge about the constitutionality of the article 102 of the Police Law issued by a presidential decision in law no. 109 year 1971 and the article (1\/third) and the article (2) of the decision of the Minister of Interior Affairs no. 156 year 1964 in organizing usage of firearms which included in these articles and allowing the police to disperse demonstrations by using firearms and shooting demonstrators<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 9544 Judiciary Year 66 Date: 2013 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: The decision of the Minister of Interior Affairs no. 156 year 1964 … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[26],"class_list":["post-1963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2013-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1963"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1964,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1963\/revisions\/1964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1963"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=1963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}