Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n
Case no.: 60693 judiciary year 66<\/p>\n
Date: 2012<\/p>\n
Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n
Department: Economic and Investment disputes (seventh)<\/p>\n
Decision appealed against: The negative decision of abstention of blocking and banning Youtube website from the internet inside Egypt<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
First verdict date: 9-2-2013<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Appellant:Mohamed Hami Salem Al Sayed<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Appealed against:\u00a0 Prime Minister \u2013 Minister of Telecommunication \u2013 Head of National Telecom Regulatory Authority \u2013 interfering in solidarity foundation of \u201cFreedom of Thought and Expression<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Judges: Non accessible<\/p>\n
Verdict text: The court ruled of<\/p>\n
First: The acceptance of the solidarity interference of the foundation of Freedom of Thought and Expression<\/p>\n
Second: The rejection of the lawsuit as the appellant has no representation concerning the first two appealed against<\/p>\n
Third:\u00a0 the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the negative decision appealed against of the abstention of taking the legally\u00a0 decided procedures to ban the mentioned websites for one month and block and ban all websites and links on the internet which show extracts from the film insulting the honoured Prophet peace be upon him under different titles, obliging the appealed against to pay expenses\u00a0 ordering to execute the verdict with its draft and without announcement and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.<\/p>\n
.<\/p>\n
The report of the State Commissioners Authority: In the appeal no. 10464, 10558 supreme judiciary year 59 session dated 14-4-2013 proceeded by first: Emad Mubarak Hassan as a legal representative of the foundation of Freedom of Thought and Expression against Mohamed Hamed Salem Al Sayed and second by the executive president of the National Telecom Regulatory Authority\u00a0 against Mohamed Hamed Salem Al Sayed and the foundation of Freedom of Thought and Expression\u00a0 the authority accepted the lawsuit in form and in subject to cancel the verdict appealed against including banning Youtube website for one month and ruled as follows:<\/p>\n
First: to reject the request of suspending execution<\/p>\n
Second: to suspend the negative decision appealed against of abstention of taking legally decided procedures concerning blocking all links on youtube and the internet showing extracts insulting Prophet Mohamed Peace Be Upon Him and Muslims directly or indirectly under any title, obliging the appellants in their capacity in the two appeals and the first appealed against with expenses for the two judiciary degrees<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 60693 judiciary year 66 Date: 2012 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: Economic and Investment disputes (seventh) Decision appealed against: The negative decision of abstention of blocking and … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[28],"class_list":["post-1764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2012-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1764"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1765,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1764\/revisions\/1765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1764"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=1764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}