{"id":1754,"date":"2013-02-11T10:10:28","date_gmt":"2013-02-11T10:10:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrinfo.org?p=1754"},"modified":"2018-02-11T10:10:45","modified_gmt":"2018-02-11T10:10:45","slug":"appealing-against-forming-membership-of-peasants-in-the-committee-of-the-50-for-amending-the-consititution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/?p=1754&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Appealing against forming membership of peasants in the committee of the 50 for amending the consititution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n<p>Case no.: 77685 Judiciary year 67<\/p>\n<p>Date: 2013<\/p>\n<p>Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n<p>Department: First<\/p>\n<p>Decision appealed against: The presidential decision no. 606 year 2013<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>First verdict date: 29-10-2013<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Mohamed Sobh al Dabash<\/p>\n<p>The Appealed against: The temporary President of the Republic \u2013 Head of the Committee of the 50 each in his capacity<\/p>\n<p>Judges: President \u2013 Mohamed Ibrahm Qishta<\/p>\n<p>Members: Abdul Maguid Ahmed Hassan al Moqanan and Sami Ramadan Darwish<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision of the president no. 606 year 2013 with what results from this specially the assignment of the appellant as a fundamental member in the committee of the 50 replacing the deceased Mohamed Ahmed Abdul Qader, obliging the administrative body to pay the expenses of the urgent request, ordering to execute the verdict with its draft and without an announcement and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 77685 Judiciary year 67 Date: 2013 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: The presidential decision no. 606 year 2013 &nbsp; First verdict date: 29-10-2013 &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[26],"class_list":["post-1754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2013-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1754"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1754\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1755,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1754\/revisions\/1755"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1754"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=1754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}