Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n
Case no.: 56920, 59825, 61162 judiciary year 66<\/p>\n
Date: 2013<\/p>\n
Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n
Department: Economic and Investment disputes (seventh)<\/p>\n
Decision appealed against: The negative administrative decision of abstention of taking the legal decided procedures concerning violations committed by al Hafez Satellite channel owned by Al Barahin International company<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
First verdict date: 12-1-2013<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Appellant: Reda Mahmoud Shaaban Barakawi Lawyer \u2013 Elham Al Sayed Ahmed Shahin (Known as Elham Shahin) \u2013 Tarek Mahmoud Mohamed Lawyer \u2013 Assem Qandil Lawyer<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Appealed against:\u00a0 Minister of Masscommunication – Minister of investment\u00a0 \u2013 Head of the General Authority for Investment and Free Zones\u00a0 \u2013 Head of board of trustees of the Free Zone media Administration in his representation \u2013 Head of board of trustees of the Egyptian company of Satellites \u2013 Head of board of trustees of Radio and Television Union \u2013 Nasser Ali Moussa Kadsa as the Head of board ot trustees of al Barahin International Company owning al Hafez satellite channel \u2013 executive director of al Hafez channel \u2013 Atef Abdul Rashid an anchor and the director of al Hafez channel \u2013 Sheikh Abdullah Badr Abbas<\/p>\n
Judges: President \u2013 Hassouna Tawfiq Mahgoub<\/p>\n
Members: Asham Abdullah Khalil and Shaaban Abdul Aziz Abdul Wahab<\/p>\n
Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the negative decision appealed against of the abstention of taking the legally\u00a0 decided procedures concerning the violations committed by al Hafez satellite channel with its program \u201cFi Mizan Al Quran\u201d with what results from this specially suspending the broadcasting of al Hafez channel and disconnect it for 30 days and the abolishment of the violations reasons and suspension of broadcasting any other programs under different names showing the appealed against the ninth and the tenth during the period of suspension whether directly or indirectly as it is figured in the reasons\u00a0 and obliged the appealed against to pay expenses this request ordering to execute the verdict with its draft and without announcement and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The report of the State Commissioners Authority: in the appeal no. 8061 year 56 supreme judiciary session dated 13-3-2013, the authority decided after informing the appealed against with the appeal draft\u00a0 to accept the appeal in for and rejected it in subject obliging the appellant\u00a0 channel to pay expenses<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 56920, 59825, 61162 judiciary year 66 Date: 2013 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: Economic and Investment disputes (seventh) Decision appealed against: The negative administrative decision of abstention … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[26],"class_list":["post-1748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2013-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1748"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1748\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1749,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1748\/revisions\/1749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1748"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=1748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}