{"id":1714,"date":"2013-01-31T10:12:06","date_gmt":"2013-01-31T10:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hrinfo.org?p=1714"},"modified":"2018-01-31T10:12:25","modified_gmt":"2018-01-31T10:12:25","slug":"appealing-against-the-presidential-decree-no-587-year-2013-to-expand-emergency-status-for-two-months","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/?p=1714&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Appealing against the presidential decree no. 587 year 2013 to expand emergency status for two months"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims<\/p>\n<p>Case no.: 74029 judiciary year 67<\/p>\n<p>Date: 2013<\/p>\n<p>Court: Administrative judiciary<\/p>\n<p>Department: First<\/p>\n<p>Decision appealed against: The decision of the President of the Republic no. 587 year 2013 dated 12-9-2013 to expand emergency status for two months<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>First verdict date: 12-11-2013<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Ahmed Seif al Islam Hamad \u2013 Maha Mahmoud Youssef \u2013 Abir Sayed Gama Ishaq and interfering in solidarity: Gamal Abdul Aziz Eid \u2013 Rawda Ahmed Sayed \u2013 Hamed Sidiq Sayed Mikki)<\/p>\n<p>The Appealed against:\u00a0 The President of the Republic in his capacity<\/p>\n<p>Judges: President \u2013 Mohamed Ibrahim Qishta<\/p>\n<p>Members: Adul Magid Ahmed Hassan al Moqanan and Sami Ramadan Darwish<\/p>\n<p>Verdict text: The court ruled of<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>First: The rejection of the defense claiming the non competence of the court in loyality to consider the lawsuit and the assurance of its competence<\/p>\n<p>Second: the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the rejection of the suspension of the decision appealed against and obliged the claimers to pay expenses this request and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims Case no.: 74029 judiciary year 67 Date: 2013 Court: Administrative judiciary Department: First Decision appealed against: The decision of the President of the Republic no. 587 year 2013 &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"years":[26],"class_list":["post-1714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-administrative","years-2013-ar"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1714"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1715,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1714\/revisions\/1715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1714"},{"taxonomy":"years","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hrinfo.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fyears&post=1714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}