Type: Misdemeanors
Case no.: 9593 year 2013 central Cairo appealed misdemeanors
Case year: 2013
Adverse: Public Prosecution
Representation: Accusation Authority
First Degree Verdict
Date: 24-12-2013
Judges: President – Amir Essam
Court: Abdin Misdemeanors
Department: non accessible
- of defendants: 3
| S | Names | Verdict | Crime | Attending – in absentia |
| 1. | Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi | Three years imprisonment, to be subjected to police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the third, fourth, fifth and sixth accusations, and to fine him with 50 thousands L.E. for the first, second and seventh accusations | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
| 2. | Ahmed Saad Doma Saad | Three years imprisonment, to be subjected to police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the third, fourth, fifth and sixth accusations, and to fine him with 50 thousands L.E. for the first, second and seventh accusations | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
| 3. | Mohamed Adel Fahmi | Three years imprisonment, to be subjected to police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the third, fourth, fifth and sixth accusations, and to fine him with 50 thousands L.E. for the first, second and seventh accusations | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
Verdict Text:
The court ruled as follows:
First: to reject the defense concerning the non constitutionality of the articles no. 7, 8, 19, 21 of the decision of law 107 year 2013 for it is not serious
Second: to punish the defendants with three years imprisonment in effect and ordered to subject them under police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the crimes referred to in items no. three, four, five and six for their connection
Third: to fine each defendant of an amount of fifty thousands L.E. for the crimes referred to in items no. one, two and seven for their connection
Fourth: to oblige them to pay criminal expenses
=======================
Second Degree Verdict
Date:
Judges: President – Ahmed Faisal
Members – Noman Badr and Amr Saqr
Court: Abdin appealed misdemeanors
Department: non accessible
- of defendants: 3
| S | Names | Verdict | Crime | Attending – in absentia |
| 1. | Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi | Acceptance , rejection, support | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
| 2. | Ahmed Saad Doma Saad | Acceptance , rejection, support | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
| 3. | Mohamed Adel Fahmi | Acceptance , rejection, support | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
Verdict Text:
The court ruled in attendance of all defendants to accept the appeal in form and in subject to reject it and support the appealed verdict, obliging the defendants to pay criminal expenses
=========================
First Cassation Verdict
Date: 27-1-2015
Judges: President – Magdi Abdul Halim
Members – Hossam Gomaa, Ibrahim Abdullah, Youssef Qaed and Ali Abdul Badie
Court: Cassation
Department: non accessible
- of defendants: 3
| S | Names | Verdict | Crime | Attending – in absentia |
| 1. | Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi | rejection | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
| 2. | Ahmed Saad Doma Saad | rejection | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
| 3. | Mohamed Adel Fahmi | rejection | 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification | Attending |
Verdict Notes:
The court ruled to reject the appeal
