Type: Misdemeanor
Case no.: 324 year 2014 Kasr Al Nile Misdemeanors registered no. 4906 year 2014 appealed misdemeanors central Cairo
Case year: 2014
Adverse: Public Prosecutor
Representation: Accusation authority
First Verdict
Date: 30-9-2014
Judges: non accessible
Court: Kasr al Nile Misdemeanor Court
Department: non accessible
No. of Defendants: 1
| S | Names | Verdict | Accusations | Attending – in absentia |
| 1 | Hossam Shaker Sayed Ali Tantawi | Two years imprisonment in effect and to be subjected to surveillance of the police for a period equal to the penalty | 1- participating in crowding resulting: a- verbal insult to public employees during performing their job b- participating in a demonstration which violated public security and order | In absentia |
Verdict text: the court ruled of Two years imprisonment in effect and to be subjected to surveillance of the police for a period equal to the penalty, confiscation and expenses
First Opposition verdict
Date: 25-11-2014
Judges: non accessible
Court: Kasr al Nile misdemeanors court
department: non accessible
- of defendants: 1
| S | Names | Verdict | Accusations | Attending – in absentia |
| 1 | Hossam Shaker Sayed Ali Tantawi | Rejection and support | 1- participating in crowding resulting: a- verbal insult to public employees during performing their job b- participating in a demonstration which violated public security and order | In absentia |
Verdict Text:
the court ruled of the acceptance of the opposition in form and in subject the rejection of the opposition and the support of the opposed verdict and obliged the defendant to pay expenses
Second Degree verdict
Date: 28-12-2014
Judges: President – Ahmed Samir
Members – Noaman Badr Nasr and Assem Adel Al Fouly
Court: Central Cairo appealed misdemeanors court
department: non accessible
- of defendants: 1
| S | Names | Verdict | Accusations | Attending – in absentia |
| 1 | Hossam Shaker Sayed Ali Tantawi | Rejection and support | 1- participating in crowding resulting: a- verbal insult to public employees during performing their job b- participating in a demonstration which violated public security and order | In absentia |
Verdict Text:
the court ruled of the acceptance of the opposition in form and in subject the rejection of the opposition and the support of the opposed verdict and obliged the defendant to pay expenses
