Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims
Case no.: 9226 judiciary year 70
Date: 2015
Court: Administrative judiciary
Department: First
Decision appealed against: The decision of banning lawyers from entering the supreme state security headquarter to do their tasks concerning their clients or administrative tasks
First verdict date: 21-06-2016
Appellant: Malek Adly – Sameh Samir – Mohamed Eissa – Aziza al Tawil – Mohamed Azab – Anas Hassan – Mohamed Hanafi
The Appealed against: The president of the Supreme Council of Judiciary – Public Prosecutor – Public Attorney of the Supreme State Security – Minister of Justice – Minister of Interior Affairs each in his capacity
Judges: President – Yahya al Dakrouri
Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision appealed against and obliged the administrative body to pay expenses this request and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.
Supreme Administrative Court Verdict Date: 9-9-2017
Appeal no.: 82156 supreme judiciary year 62
Appellant: The president of the Supreme Council of Judiciary – Public Prosecutor – Public Attorney of the Supreme State Security – Minister of Justice – Minister of Interior Affairs each in his capacity
Appealed Against: Malek Adly – Sameh Samir – Mohamed Eissa – Aziza al Tawil – Mohamed Azab – Anas Hassan – Mohamed Hanafi
Judges: Ahmed al Shazli as a President
Verdict:
The court ruled unanimously of rejecting the appeal and obliged the administrative appealing body to pay the expenses
