| Type | Felony |
| Public title | setting fire on election headquarters of Ahmed Shafiq |
| Case number | Number 3303 year 2013 al Dokki crimes registered under no. 130 year 2013 inclusive north al Giza |
| Case year | 2013 |
| Court | Al Giza crime court |
| Department | Dep. 17 al Giza crimes |
| First degree judges | Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed
Abdul Hamid Kamel Ahmed Aziz al Fiqi |
| First appeal judges | Non accessible |
| Number of accused | 12 |
| Defendants | 1 – Bahaa Abdul Azim Ali Bastawisi
Sultan Faris Mahmoud Abdel Halim 3 – Alaa Ahmed Saif al-Islam Abdel-Fattah 4- Mona Ahmed Saif Al-Islam Abdel-Fattah 5 – Yehia Wahid Ali Saleh 6 – Ahmed Abdullah Abu Ala Abdullah 7. Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed Al-Qadi 8- Mohamed Mohamed El Masry 9 – Ihab Mustafa Hassan Ammar 10- Amira Ashraf Sayed Al-Shahat 11. Sabria Ahmad Abdullah 12. Ahmed Sultan Abu Al-Majd |
| Adverse and representation | Public prosecution – accusation authority |
| Accusations | All accused: Participation in a gathering of more than five persons resulted in:
1 – Putting fire deliberately in a building that is not inhabited or prepared for housing. 2 – stealing money belong to the former presidential candidate Ahmed Shafiq 3 – deliberately destroy properties 4. Parading force and threatening with the use of violence |
| Accusation articles | 304/2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and articles 32, 45, 46, 252/1, 275 bis.1-2 of the Penal Code |
| First attended verdict | 5th January 2014 |
| Verdict | The court ruled
First: To punish the accused Bahaa Abdel Azim Ali, Alaa Ahmed Seif El Islam, Mona Ahmed Saif El Islam, Yahya Waheed Ali Saleh, Ahmed Abdullah Aboul Ela and in absentia by punishing the defendants Sultan Fares Mahmoud Abdel Halim, Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed El Qadi, Mohamed Mohamed El Masry, Ihab Mostafa Hassan Ammar Amira Ashraf Al-Shehhat, Sabria Ahmad Abdullah known as Mona Wafa and Ahmed Sultan Abu Al-Majd were sentenced to one year in prison and ordered to suspend the sentence for three years from the date of the verdict. Second: The expiry of the criminal case for all those accused after conciliation on charges of intentional destruction Thirdly: All defendants are acquitted of the charge of theft |
| Notes |
