Type: Misdemeanor
Case no.: 9593 year 2013 Abdin department misdemeanors regisgerted no. 5957 year 2013 Central Cairo appealed misdemeanors.
Case year: 2013
Adverse: Public Prosecution
Representation: Accusation authority
Notes: ….
First degree verdict
First degree verdict date: 22 \ 12 \ 2013
First degree judges: Amir Mohamed Essam – President
Court: Abdin partial court
Department defendants no: 3
Defendant Name | Crime | Verdict | Attended – Absentia | |
1 | Ahmed Maher Ibrahim Tantawi | 1- gathering
2- participating in a demonstration and disrupting public interests 3- parading force and violence against public employees 4- assaulting public employees 5- deliberate subversion of movable properties. 6- acquisition elements used in assault against personnels 7- arranging a demonstration without notifying the competent bodies. |
Three years imprisonment in effect and another three years under police surveillance for the crimes no. 3, 4, 5 and 6 for they are related. And a fine of fifty thousands Egyptian pounds for the crimes 1,2 and 7 for they are related. | Attending |
2 | Ahmed Saad Doma Saad | 1- gathering
2- participating in a demonstration and disrupting public interests 3- parading force and violence against public employees 4- assaulting public employees 5- deliberate subversion of movable properties. 6- acquisition elements used in assault against personnels 7- arranging a demonstration without notifying the competent bodies. |
Three years imprisonment in effect and another three years under police surveillance for the crimes no. 3, 4, 5 and 6 for they are related. And a fine of fifty thousands Egyptian pounds for the crimes 1,2 and 7 for they are related. | Attending |
3 | Mohamed Adel Fahmy | 1- gathering
2- participating in a demonstration and disrupting public interests 3- parading force and violence against public employees 4- assaulting public employees 5- deliberate subversion of movable properties. 6- acquisition elements used in assault against personnels 7- arranging a demonstration without notifying the competent bodies. |
Three years imprisonment in effect and another three years under police surveillance for the crimes no. 3, 4, 5 and 6 for they are related. And a fine of fifty thousands Egyptian pounds for the crimes 1,2 and 7 for they are related. | Attending |
Verdict Text The court ruled:
In the attendance of all defendants:
First: of the rejection of the defense claim concerning the unconstitutionality of the articles 7,8,21 and 19 of the decree in law 107 year 2013, for the absence of seriousness.
Second: of punishing the defendants with three years in prison in effect, the court ordered to put them under surveillance of the police for an equal period and that for the crimes they are accused of numbers three, four, five and six for they are related.
Third: Fining each defendant of fifty thousands Egyptian pound for the crimes they are accused of numbers one, two and seven for they are related.
Fourth: Obliging the defendants to pay the criminal expenses.
———————————————————————————————-
Second degree verdict
Date: 7 \ 4 \ 2014
Judes: President: Ahmed Faissal
Members: Noaman Badr and Amr Saqr
Court: South Cairo primary court
Department defendants no : 3
Defendant Name | Crime | Verdict | Attended – Absentia | |
1 | Ahmed Maher Ibrahim Tantawi | 1- gathering
2- participating in a demonstration and disrupting public interests 3- parading force and violence against public employees 4- assaulting public employees 5- deliberate subversion of movable properties. 6- acquisition elements used in assault against personnels 7- arranging a demonstration without notifying the competent bodies. |
Accepting the appeal in form and rejecting it in subject. | Attending |
2 | Ahmed Saad Doma Saad | 1- gathering
2- participating in a demonstration and disrupting public interests 3- parading force and violence against public employees 4- assaulting public employees 5- deliberate subversion of movable properties. 6- acquisition elements used in assault against personnels 7- arranging a demonstration without notifying the competent bodies. |
Accepting the appeal in form and rejecting it in subject. | Attending |
3 | Mohamed Adel Fahmy | 1- gathering
2- participating in a demonstration and disrupting public interests 3- parading force and violence against public employees 4- assaulting public employees 5- deliberate subversion of movable properties. 6- acquisition elements used in assault against personnels 7- arranging a demonstration without notifying the competent bodies. |
Accepting the appeal in form and rejecting it in subject. | Attending |
Verdict Text The court ruled:
In the attendance of all defendants:
Of accepting the appeal in form and rejecting it in subject supporting the appealed verdict and obliging the defendants to pay the criminal expenses.