Type: Felony
Case no.: 3896 year 2011 Al Sayeda Zeinab Department registered no. 604 year 2011 inclusive
Case year: from 2001 to 2005
Adverse: Public Prosecution
Representation: Accusation authority
Notes: Trial of one of the symbols of the ousted regime Hosni Mubarak
First Verdict
Date: 28-3-2012
Judges:
Court: Cairo Criminal Court
Department:
No. of Defendants: 3
S | Names | Verdict | Crime | Attending – in absentia |
1. | Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Soleiman | Aggravated imprisonment for three years and returning an amount of 14,092,412 and 10,861,748 Egyptian pounds and a fine equal to the two amounts mentioned
|
1- acquired for himself, without al legal right, a profit and an interest from a task of his job as a public employee
2- acquired for others without a legal right a profit and an interest from a task of his job as a public employee |
Attending |
2. | Yahya Ahmed Al Sayed Al Komi | Imprisonment for one year in effect and returning an amount of 2,274,535 L.E. and fine of an amount equal to the mentioned amount | 1- participating through agreement and assistance with the first defendant to commit the crime mentioned in the second item | Attending |
3. | Emad Al Sayed Mohamed Al Hathiq | One year imprisonment in effect and returning an amount of 7,989,700 L.E. and a fine equal to the mentioned amount | 1- participating through agreement and assistance with the first defendant to commit the crime mentioned in the second item | In absentia |
First Verdict Text:
The court ruled in attendance of the first two defendants and in absentia of the third defendant as follows:
First: to Punish the first defendant with aggravated imprisonment for three years and returning an amount of 14,092,412 L.E. and 10,861,748 L.E. and fining him of an amount equal to the two
mentioned amounts
Second: to punish the second and third defendants of one year imprisonment in effect and obliging the second defendant to return an amount of 2274,535 L.E. and a fine equal to the mentioned amount and to oblige the third defendant to return an amount of 7,989.700 and a fine equal to the mentioned amount as for the accusations set against them. The court ordered to suspend the penalty ruled in total suspension for any penalty follows and all the criminal results derived from the verdict
Third: the referral of the civil suits to the competent civil court and it is up to the civil court to determine expenses
=================================
First Cassation Verdict
Date: 27-12-2012
Judges: Hossam Abdul Rahim – President
Members – Ali Fergani and Mohamed Abdul Wahhab and Essam Ibtahim and Mahmoud Raslan
Court: Cassation Court
Department: Criminal (Thursday (c))
No. of defendants: 1
S | Names | Verdict | Crime | Attending – in absentia |
1 | Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed Soleiman | Appeal acceptance, reduction of the returning amount from 10,861,748 to 9,033,683 L.E. and supporting the rest of the verdict | 1- acquired for himself, without al legal right, a profit and an interest from a task of his job as a public employee
2- acquired for others without a legal right a profit and an interest from a task of his job as a public employee |
Attending |
Verdict Text:
The court ruled to accept the appeal in form and in subject to partially revoke the verdict appealed against and correct it to make the amount to be returned by the appellant nine millions and thirty three thousands and six hundred and eighty L.E. 9, 033,683 L.E. not ten millions and eight hundred and sixty one thousands and seven hundred and forty eight L.E. and rejecting the appeal in the rest of the verdict’s items