Type: Felony
Case no.: 2291 year 2011 al Sayeda Zeinab department registered no. 157 year 2011 inclusive
Case Year: 2011
Adverse: Public Prosecution
Representation: Accusation authority
Notes: Trial of Mubarak’s regime symbols
First Verdict
Date: 12-7-2011
Judges: President – Assem Abdul Hamid
Members – Abdul Monem Abdul Sattar and Sami Zein al Din
Court: Cairo Criminal Court
Department: non accessible
- of defendants: 4
Accusations:
First to third defendants: As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined to the authority they work for
Second and third defendants: As a public employee he acquired money as a levy without a legal right
Fourth defendant: participated through agreement and assistant with public employees in committing two crimes of acquiring for others a profit without a legal right through a task of their jobs and facilitating for others to rob public money without a legal right
| S | Names | Verdict | Attending – in absentia |
| 1. | Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Nazif | One year imprisonment with suspension of the penalty for three years and isolating him from his job | Attending |
| 2. | Youssef Raouf Botros Ghali | Aggravated imprisonment for ten years with isolation from his job | In absentia |
| 3. | Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly | Aggravated imprisonment for five years with isolation from his job | Attending |
| 4. | Himlock Gingili | One year imprisonment with suspension of the penalty for three years | In absentia |
Verdict Text:
The court ruled in attendance of the first and third defendants and in absentia of the second and fourth defendants as follows:
First: To punish the first and fourth defendant with one year imprisonment in effect with suspension of the penalty for three years starting from the issuance of the verdict
Second: To punish the second defendant with ten years aggravated imprisonment
Third: To punish the third defendant with five years aggravated imprisonment
Fourth: to isolate the first, second and third defendants from their jobs
Fifth: to fine all the defendants an amount of 92,561,588,32 L.E. and returning an equal amount for the mentioned amount
Sixth: To fine the second and the third an amount of 100,564,235 L.E. and returning an amount equal to the mentioned amount
Seventh: the referral of the civil suits to the competent civil court
==========================
First verdict (repeating procedures)
Date: 24-1-2017
Judges: President – Hamada Shukri
Members – Nasser Sadek Barbari and Ossama Mohamed Ali
Court: Cairo Criminal Court
Department: non accessible
No. of defendants: 1
| S | Names | Verdict | Accusation | Attending – in absentia |
| 1 | Himlock Gingili | Acquittal | participated through agreement and assistant with public employees in committing two crimes of acquiring for others a profit without a legal right through a task of their jobs and facilitating for others to rob public money without a legal right | Attending |
Verdict Text:
The court ruled of the acquittal of the defendant in his attendance
==========================
First Cassation Verdict
Date: 13-2-2013
Judges: President – Hamed Abdullah
Members – Yahya Khalifa and Mohamed Eid Salem and Mohamed Mahmoud Mahamid and Mansour al Qadi
Court: Cassation
No. of defendants: 2
Notes: Two of the civil prosecutors (Said Fathallah Khedr and Mohamed Yasser Said Fathallah) submitted an appeal against the defendants all and the court ruled of the non validity of the appeal
| S | Names | Verdict | Accusation | Attending – in absentia |
| 1. | Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Nazif | Acceptance and retrial | As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined to the authority they work for | Attending |
| 2. | Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly | Acceptance and retrial | As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined to the authority they work for – As a public employee he acquired money as a levy without a legal right | Attending |
Verdict Text:
The court ruled:
First: of the non validity of the appeal submitted by the civil prosecutors and the confiscation of the bail
Second: of the acceptance of the appeal submitted by the defendants in form and in subject to suspend the verdict appealed against and the returning of the case to the Cairo Criminal Court to renew its rule in a different department for them both without the including of the other two defendants
==========================
Retrial Verdict:
Date: 24-2-2015
Judges: President – Bashir Abdul Aal
Members – Sayed Abdul Aziz al Toni and Alaa Kamal al Beili
Court: Cairo Criminal Court
Department: non accessible
No. of defendants; 2
| S | Names | Verdict | Accusation | Attending – in absentia |
| 1 | Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Nazif | Acquittal | As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined to the authority they work for | Attending |
| 2 | Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly | Acquittal | As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined to the authority they work for – As a public employee he acquired money as a levy without a legal right | Attending |
Verdict text:
the court ruled of the acquittal of the two defendants
