Pulic Title for the case: Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi 9593 year 2013 Abdim misdemeanors

Type: Misdemeanors

Case no.: 9593 year 2013 central Cairo appealed misdemeanors

Case year: 2013

Adverse: Public Prosecution

Representation: Accusation Authority

 

First Degree Verdict

Date: 24-12-2013

Judges: President – Amir Essam

Court: Abdin Misdemeanors

Department: non accessible

  1. of defendants: 3
S Names Verdict Crime Attending – in absentia
1. Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi Three years imprisonment, to be subjected to police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the third, fourth, fifth and sixth accusations, and to fine him with 50 thousands L.E. for the first, second and seventh accusations 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending
2. Ahmed Saad Doma Saad Three years imprisonment, to be subjected to police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the third, fourth, fifth and sixth accusations, and to fine him with 50 thousands L.E. for the first, second and seventh accusations 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending
3. Mohamed Adel Fahmi Three years imprisonment, to be subjected to police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the third, fourth, fifth and sixth accusations, and to fine him with 50 thousands L.E. for the first, second and seventh accusations 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending

 

Verdict Text:

The court ruled as follows:

First: to reject the defense concerning the non constitutionality of the articles no. 7, 8, 19, 21 of the decision of law 107 year 2013 for it is not serious

Second: to punish the defendants with three years imprisonment in effect and ordered to subject them under police surveillance for a period equal to the penalty for the crimes referred to in items no. three, four, five and six for their connection

Third: to fine each defendant of an amount of fifty thousands L.E. for the crimes referred to in items no. one, two and seven for their connection

Fourth: to oblige them to pay criminal expenses

=======================

Second Degree Verdict

Date:

Judges: President – Ahmed Faisal

Members – Noman Badr and Amr Saqr

Court: Abdin appealed misdemeanors

Department: non accessible

  1. of defendants: 3
S Names Verdict Crime Attending – in absentia
1. Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi Acceptance , rejection, support 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending
2. Ahmed Saad Doma Saad Acceptance , rejection, support 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending
3. Mohamed Adel Fahmi Acceptance , rejection, support 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending

 

 

Verdict Text:

The court ruled in attendance of all defendants to accept the appeal in form and in subject to reject it and support the appealed verdict, obliging the defendants to pay criminal expenses

=========================

First Cassation Verdict

Date: 27-1-2015

Judges: President – Magdi Abdul Halim

Members – Hossam Gomaa, Ibrahim Abdullah, Youssef Qaed and Ali Abdul Badie

Court: Cassation

Department: non accessible

  1. of defendants: 3
S Names Verdict Crime Attending – in absentia
1. Ahmed Maher Ibrahim al Tantawi  rejection 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending
2. Ahmed Saad Doma Saad rejection 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending
3. Mohamed Adel Fahmi rejection 1- planning and participating in a crowding 2- participating in a demonstration without a notification 3- parading force 4- assaulting public employees during and for the reason of performing their jobs 5- deliberate subversion of private properties 6- acquisition and possession instruments used in assaulting persons 7- organizing a demonstration without notification Attending

 

Verdict Notes:

The court ruled to reject the appeal