Pulic Title for the case: Appealing against the decision of banning lawyers from entering the Supreme State Security headquarter to do their jobs

Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims

Case no.: 9226 judiciary year 70

Date: 2015

Court: Administrative judiciary

Department: First

Decision appealed against: The decision of banning lawyers from entering the supreme state security headquarter to do their tasks concerning their clients or administrative tasks

 

First verdict date: 21-06-2016

Appellant: Malek Adly – Sameh Samir – Mohamed Eissa – Aziza al Tawil – Mohamed Azab – Anas Hassan – Mohamed Hanafi

The Appealed against: The president of the Supreme Council of Judiciary – Public Prosecutor – Public Attorney of the Supreme State Security – Minister of Justice – Minister of Interior Affairs each in his capacity

Judges: President – Yahya al Dakrouri

 

Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision appealed against and obliged the administrative body to pay expenses this request and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.

Supreme Administrative Court Verdict Date: 9-9-2017

Appeal no.: 82156 supreme judiciary year 62

Appellant:  The president of the Supreme Council of Judiciary – Public Prosecutor – Public Attorney of the Supreme State Security – Minister of Justice – Minister of Interior Affairs each in his capacity

Appealed Against: Malek Adly – Sameh Samir – Mohamed Eissa – Aziza al Tawil – Mohamed Azab – Anas Hassan – Mohamed Hanafi

Judges: Ahmed al Shazli as  a President

Verdict:

The court ruled unanimously of rejecting the appeal and obliged the administrative appealing body to pay the expenses