Pulic Title for the case: Habib al Adly and Ahmed Nazif “Metal Plates case” 2291 year 2011 al Sayeda Zeinab Department

Type: Felony

Case no.: 2291 year 2011 al Sayeda Zeinab department registered no. 157 year 2011 inclusive

Case Year: 2011

Adverse: Public Prosecution

Representation: Accusation authority

Notes: Trial of Mubarak’s regime symbols

First Verdict

Date: 12-7-2011

Judges: President – Assem Abdul Hamid

Members – Abdul Monem Abdul Sattar and Sami Zein al Din

Court: Cairo Criminal Court

Department: non accessible

  1. of defendants: 4

Accusations:

First to third defendants: As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined  to the authority they work for

Second and third defendants: As a public employee he acquired money as a levy without a legal right

Fourth defendant: participated through agreement and assistant with public employees in committing two crimes of acquiring for others a profit without a legal right through a task of their jobs and facilitating for others to rob public money without a legal right

S Names Verdict Attending – in absentia
                         1. Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Nazif One year imprisonment with suspension of the penalty for three years and isolating him from his job Attending
                         2. Youssef Raouf Botros Ghali Aggravated imprisonment for ten years with isolation from his job In absentia
                         3. Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly Aggravated imprisonment for five years with isolation from his job Attending
                         4. Himlock Gingili One year imprisonment with suspension of the penalty for three years In absentia

Verdict Text:

The court ruled in attendance of the first and third defendants and in absentia of the second and fourth defendants as follows:

First: To punish the first and fourth defendant with one year imprisonment in effect with suspension of the penalty for three years starting from the issuance of the verdict

Second: To punish the second defendant with ten years aggravated imprisonment

Third: To punish the third defendant with five years aggravated imprisonment

Fourth: to isolate the first, second and third defendants from their jobs

Fifth: to fine all the defendants an amount of 92,561,588,32 L.E. and returning an equal amount for the mentioned amount

Sixth: To fine the second and the third an amount of 100,564,235 L.E. and returning an amount equal to the mentioned amount

Seventh: the referral of the civil suits to the competent civil court

==========================

First verdict (repeating procedures)

Date: 24-1-2017

Judges: President – Hamada Shukri

Members – Nasser Sadek Barbari and Ossama Mohamed Ali

Court: Cairo Criminal Court

Department: non accessible

No. of defendants: 1

S Names Verdict Accusation Attending – in absentia
1 Himlock Gingili Acquittal participated through agreement and assistant with public employees in committing two crimes of acquiring for others a profit without a legal right through a task of their jobs and facilitating for others to rob public money without a legal right Attending

Verdict Text:

The court ruled of the acquittal of the defendant in his attendance

==========================

First Cassation Verdict

Date: 13-2-2013

Judges: President – Hamed Abdullah

Members – Yahya Khalifa and Mohamed Eid Salem and Mohamed Mahmoud Mahamid and Mansour al Qadi

Court: Cassation

No. of defendants: 2

Notes: Two of the civil prosecutors (Said Fathallah Khedr and Mohamed Yasser Said Fathallah) submitted an appeal against the defendants all and the court ruled of the non validity of the appeal

S Names Verdict Accusation Attending – in absentia
                   1. Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Nazif Acceptance and retrial As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined  to the authority they work for Attending
                   2. Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly Acceptance and retrial As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined  to the authority they work for –   As a public employee he acquired money as a levy without a legal right Attending

Verdict Text:

The court ruled:

First: of the non validity of the appeal submitted by the civil prosecutors and the confiscation of the bail

Second: of the acceptance of the appeal submitted by the defendants in form and in subject to suspend the verdict appealed against and the returning of the case to the Cairo Criminal Court to renew its rule in a different department for them both without the including of the other two defendants

==========================

Retrial Verdict:

Date: 24-2-2015

Judges: President – Bashir Abdul Aal

Members – Sayed Abdul Aziz al Toni and Alaa Kamal al Beili

Court: Cairo Criminal Court

Department: non accessible

No. of defendants; 2

S Names Verdict Accusation Attending – in absentia
1 Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Nazif Acquittal As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined  to the authority they work for Attending
2 Habib Ibrahim Habib al Adly Acquittal As a public employee, he acquired for others, without a legal right, a profit from a task of his job – as a public employee he facilitated to others robbing a public body finances – as a public employee he deliberately caused a big damage the finances not confined  to the authority they work for –   As a public employee he acquired money as a levy without a legal right Attending

Verdict text:

the court ruled of the acquittal of the two defendants