Pulic Title for the case: Appealing against the decision of appropriation of Ramlet Bolak land

Type: Administrative cancellation and other administrative claims

Case no.: 55949, 55909, 55875, 55784 judiciary year 66

Date: 2012

Court: Administrative judiciary

Department: Fourth

Decision appealed against: The decision of the Cairo governorate  no. 8993 year 2011 issued on 19-10-2011 and published in ‘Al Waqee al Masria’ in the issue no. 142 on 20-6-2012 including the temporary appropriation of the land of Nile Towers slums – Bolak Abu al Ela district – Cairo governorate

First verdict date: 21-08-2013

 

Appellant: (Mohsen Gebril Asran Mohamed – Hassan Sayed Abdul Aal Sayed) in the lawsuit no. 55949 and (Samir Abdul Aziz Youssef Ahmed – Abdullah Farahat Ibrahim Ramadan) lawsuit no. 55909 and (Farhana Nasser Ali Ahmed – Gaber Younis Sayed – Khaled Nour Hussein – Karima Ahmed Soleiman – Anwar Ramadan Abdul Latif – Mohamed Abdul Latif Abdul Karim – Gamal Abul Al Magd Abdul Latif – Ahmed Abdul Aal Abdul Karim – Sabri Ibrahim Hussein – Khalil Ibrahim Otefi – Wafaa Saad al Din Radwan) in lawsuit no. 55875 and (Hammad Arabi al Sayed Hammad – Ismail Mohamed Ismail – Tamer Saber Fahmi – Ibrahim Hamouda

Mohamed Ismail) in lawsuit no. 55784

The Appealed against: Cairo governor and Prime Minister in their capacity in lawsuit no. 55949 – The President – Prime Minister – Minister of Local Development – Minister of Housing and Urban Communities – Governor of Cairo –

Chairman of the Board of the Slum Development Fund –

Director of Property Management, Cairo Governorate in their capacity in the lawsuit 55875 and Prim Minister – Governor of Cairo – Chairman of the Board of the Slum Development Fund in their capacity in the lawsuit 55784

Judges: President – Ahmed Ali Abu Al Naga Ali

Members: Wagih Abdul Aziz Refaie and Ahmed Fathi Al Husseini Al Shawwaf

Verdict text: The court ruled of the acceptance of the lawsuit in form and the suspension of the decision appealed against with what results from this in the way figured in the reasons and obliged the administrative body to pay expenses this request and the referral of the lawsuit to the State Commissioners Authority to prepare a report concerning the legal point of view.

.